TY - JOUR AB - This article takes stock of where the field of behavioral science applied to education policy seems to be at, which avenues seem promising and which ones seem like dead ends. I present a curated set of studies rather than an exhaustive literature review, categorizing interventions by whether they nudge (keep options intact) or “shove” (restrict choice), and whether they apply a high or low touch (whether they use face-to-face interaction or not). Many recent attempts to test large-scale low touch nudges find precisely estimated null effects, suggesting we should not expect letters, text messages, and online exercises to serve as panaceas for addressing education policy’s key challenges. Programs that impose more choice-limiting structure to a youth’s routine, like mandated tutoring, or programs that nudge parents, appear more promising. AU - Oreopoulos, Philip DA - September 2020 DO - 10.26300/5kqf-7j06 PY - 2020 ST - Promises and limitations of nudging in education T2 - EdWorkingPapers.com TI - Promises and limitations of nudging in education UR - https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai20-296 ID - 270 ER -