Search EdWorkingPapers

Search EdWorkingPapers by author, title, or keywords.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Corequisite English Developmental Education: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Texas Community Colleges

We estimate the societal costs associated with corequisite and traditional pre-requisite English developmental education and compare them to societal benefits. Our context is the randomized controlled trial conducted by Miller et al. (2022) that estimated the effects of three different approaches to English corequisites implemented in 5 Texas community colleges. The main drivers of differential costs across pathways and colleges are the number of credit and contact hours in each pathway, class sizes, and the type of faculty used to teach courses (adjunct or full-time). Corequisites are less expensive than pre-requisite pathways in two colleges, they are more expensive yet roughly similar in two other colleges, and they are much more expensive in one college. Miller et al. (2022) find that corequisites induced more students to pass the required college-level English course in all colleges, but do not find that they impacted persistence in college. Considering the enormous societal benefit of a college education, corequisites are most likely the preferred policy from a societal point of view even when they are more expensive to implement and given that they only have a small impact on the likelihood of completing college. From students’ point of view, corequisites are always preferred because they require less tuition and have a higher likelihood of success.

Keywords
Community College, Corequisite, Developmental Education, Cost Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/kxa8-1002

EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:

Cunha, Jesse, Trey Miller, Megan Austin, Lindsay Daugherty, and Paco Martorell. (). A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Corequisite English Developmental Education: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Texas Community Colleges. (EdWorkingPaper: 23-764). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/kxa8-1002

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX